New — grade a company’s financials from just its ticker

Don’t just read it.
Know whether to believe it.

Documentalyze reads the whole source — a research paper, a news article, or a company’s financial filings — grades it on a rubric you can inspect, fact-checks its own claims against the source, and hands you something worth sharing.

Paste a DOI, drop a PDF, link a news article — or just type a stock ticker. No account · no card required.

🔒 documentalyze.com/app

Randomized controlled trial · Cardiology · 6 min read

The blood-pressure drug that worked — but not for everyone

A 4,800-patient trial found a 21% relative risk reduction — driven almost entirely by patients over 60.

0
/100
Solid evidence
Study designAdequate
Sample size & powerWeak
Blinding & controlsStrong
Conflicts of interestStrong
GeneralizabilityUnclear
Overstated

“The drug cuts heart-attack risk by a fifth.”

Calibrated: cut relative risk 21% in this trial — with the benefit concentrated in patients over 60.

21%
RELATIVE RISK, DOWN
4,800
PATIENTS, 5 YEARS
11 claims verified · 1 calibrated · LinkedIn + X thread ready

Resolves full text from the places research actually lives

arXivPubMed CentralbioRxivmedRxivCrossref DOISemantic ScholarEurope PMCUnpaywallSEC EDGARarXivPubMed CentralbioRxivmedRxivCrossref DOISemantic ScholarEurope PMCUnpaywallSEC EDGAR

Drop in a study. Walk away with all of this.

0/ 100 · Solid evidence

Not a black box — a transparent rubric. Design, power, controls, bias, conflicts, reproducibility: each criterion rated and explained, adapted to the field. The headline score is computed from the rubric, so it can never contradict it.

Randomization & blindingStrong
Sample size & powerAdequate
Conflicts of interestWeak

“Coffee prevents cancer.”

Linked to lower risk in this sample — not proven to prevent it.

A second, adversarial pass re-reads the source and rewrites any claim that says more than the data shows — automatically.

−1.6 kg · CI [−2.9, −0.3] · p=0.02 · n=212

Effect sizes, intervals, and p-values surfaced on every finding. Flip one switch between plain language and the hard numbers.

1Cravings are dopamine predictions, not taste.
2Two weeks of less sugar measurably dulled them.
3The piece cites small trials — early evidence.

News, essays, blogs — a visual digest with take-home points, a structured synopsis, and an honest read on the framing.

2.4×
FASTER RECALL
38
TRUST SCORE
n=212
REAL SAMPLE

Stat cards, reel scripts, an Instagram carousel with a real data slide, a LinkedIn post, and an X thread — every number checked against the source first.

EnglishEspañol中文العربيةहिन्दीFrançaisPortuguês日本語

Reads sources in any language, writes the digest in yours — right-to-left included.

Papers, news, and now financial reports.

Graded for trust

The whole PDF — figures, tables, statistics — read and scored on a transparent evidence rubric, with the hard numbers on every finding.

Digested, framing called out

Any news story, essay, or blog becomes take-home points, a structured synopsis, and an honest read on what’s reported fact versus opinion.

NEW

Graded for financial health

Type a ticker like AAPL and it pulls the latest 10-K and 10-Q straight from SEC EDGAR — then grades financial health A–F, judges growth, and flags risks by severity.

Debt wall — $300M due vs $180M cash
Greater China revenue −4% YoY
Gross margin slipping on tariffs

US-listed companies via SEC EDGAR · or upload any filing, annual report, or fact sheet · educational analysis, not investment advice

01

It reads the actual paper. All of it.

Not a text scrape of the abstract. Documentalyze ingests the real PDF — the figures, tables, and statistics where findings actually live. Hundred-page monsters get read in parallel parts. No open-access PDF? It races Unpaywall, Semantic Scholar, and Europe PMC, then falls back to the page’s own full text rather than giving up.

  • Figures, tables & stats read from the source PDF
  • 100+ page papers map-reduced in parallel
  • DOI, arXiv, PubMed, publisher links — resolved automatically

page 47 of 112

Table 3 — primary outcomes

21%0.79p=.003n=4,80095% CI60+ yrs

Every reported value captured verbatim

02

It grades the evidence — then corrects itself.

Peer-reviewed research found AI summaries are ~5× more likely than human ones to overgeneralize. So Documentalyze doesn’t trust itself either: an adversarial second pass re-reads the source, flags every claim that says more than the data shows, and applies the calibrated wording automatically. You read the corrected version.

  • Itemized rubric — the score is computed from it, never invented
  • Association stays association; hedges stay hedged
  • Corrections applied into the digest, with the audit trail visible

AI overgeneralization: Royal Society Open Science, 2025

0/ 100 · Mixed evidence
Study designAdequate
Sample size & powerWeak
Statistical rigorStrong
ReproducibilityWeak

Overstated “Coffee prevents cancer.”

Calibrated: linked to lower risk in this sample — not proven to prevent it.

03

Turn any study into posts that won’t get you fact-checked.

Every analysis ships with platform-native content — stat cards, a reel script, an Instagram carousel with a real data-chart slide, a LinkedIn post, and an X thread. Each number is verified against the source before you ever see it.

  • Square + reel exports, 6 styles
  • Carousel with a live data slide
  • LinkedIn post, written like a human
  • X thread — one idea per post
  • 5-second animated reel videos
  • Honest about weak evidence, always
Documentalyze
2.4×
Faster recall

Students who slept 8h recalled facts 2.4× better than those who pulled an all-nighter.

documentalyze.com✓ verified
Style:Emerald

In an age of confident, AI-generated answers, the rarest thing is an honest “this evidence is weak.”
Documentalyze is built to say it.

Anyone who needs the truth of it, fast

Clinicians & researchers

Triage journal-club papers and judge evidence in minutes, not evenings.

Students & trainees

Understand primary literature — and learn what makes a study strong.

Journalists & creators

Report findings accurately, with the caveats most coverage drops.

Curious minds & leaders

Decide on real evidence — and spot the studies that don’t hold up.

0+
pages read in full, per paper
0
evidence dimensions graded
0
passes — analyze, verify, calibrate
0
share formats per analysis

Read the next one like an expert.

Drop in a study, this morning’s headline, or a stock ticker — and see its data, its findings, and exactly how much to trust it.

Analyze something — free

No account · no card · works on phones